So what are the benefits of using a bicycle instead of a van ....? |
|||||
 |
We don't use vans or scooters so we don't burn petrol or deisel- we think its important to use less fossil fuels where possible, we hope other companies will follow our lead. |
 |
We're setting a great example to everyone who see's our colourful bicycles saying-get out of your car and ride to work, its easy, less stressful and kinder to the environment |
||
 |
You will be reducing harmful emissions in the air by keeping vans off the road- And thats good for everyone as we all breath the same air |
 |
We are helping to preserve the precious fossil fuels we have left- because they will not last forever, and you can be sure they will continue to become more expensive as they become more scarce. |
||
 |
We are also reducing congestion in London- If there were more bicycles on the road there would be less traffic jams, it would also reduce the cost of road repairs / highway maintenance |
 |
Greenworkforce - because hiring a handyman needn't cost the earth |
||
Carbon neutral explained
- Being carbon neutral, or having a zero carbon footprint, refers to achieving net zero carbon emissions by balancing a measured amount of carbon released with an equivalent amount sequestered or offset.The carbon neutral concept may be extended to include other greenhouse gases (GHG) measured in terms of their carbon dioxide equivalence -- the impact a GHG has on the atmosphere expressed in the equivalent amount of CO2 . The term climate neutral is used to reflect the fact that it is not just carbon dioxide (CO2), that is driving climate change, even if it is the most abundant, but also encompasses other greenhouse gases regulated by the Kyoto Protocol, namely: methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). Both terms are used interchangeably throughout this article.
Carbon neutral resources
Here is an article from a site called TreeHugger .com
It makes interesting reading if you've got s few spare mins
- We are always on about how efficient bicycles are as a means of mobility. See our early Eco-Tip on the topic. More recently the WorldWatch Institute published some intriguing figures on cycling. Comparing energy used per passenger-mile (calories), they found that a bicycle needed only 35 calories, whereas a car expended a whopping 1,860. Bus and trains fell about midway between, and walking still took 3 times as many calories as riding a bike the same distance. They also looked at a measurement called: ‘Persons per hour that one meter-width-equivalent right-of-way can carry’. In this case Rail scored tops with 4,000 persons, but ‘autos in mixed traffic’ still managed the worse ......
to read on follow this link- bicycle efficiency article cont'd.
